Skip to content

Not Solving Problems Effectively? What May Be Missing From Your Team

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Men teaming up to reel in fish
Building teams that have a mix of problem-solving approaches, without maintaining an environment that leverages it, will waste a valuable asset.

Behavioral Sciences and practical experience make a strong case for the problem-solving effectiveness of groups comprised of teammates with diverse cognitive behaviors; but, it doesn’t end there. Building teams that have a mix of problem-solving approaches, without maintaining an environment that leverages it, will waste a valuable asset.

In this Harvard Business Review piece, The Two Traits of the Best Problem-Solving Teams from Alison Reynolds and David Lewis, the importance of a psychologically safe environment is illuminated.

 For some, the terminology may be cringe-worthy. “Psychologically safe”, should not be confused with the dispensing of accountability or a lack of results-orientation. In our practice, we help organizations achieve their potential by embracing accountability and focusing on results. Those attributes have their place and are mission critical. In this context, “safety” is fostered, for example, by treating mistakes with intellectual curiosity and shared responsibility for the outcomes. After all, there is a profound difference between a bad outcome and a bad idea.

The authors paint a useful picture of groups that possess both a high degree of cognitive diversity and a high degree of psychological safety. Let us know how these principles have affected teams in your professional experience. What characteristics were present in your most effective problem-solving groups?

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Office staff sailing in the same boat to the goal.

Team Alignment and Performance

We may believe our teams are aligned, but often there are impediments in the way that go unrecognized. There are things you can do to make sure your performance doesn’t suffer because your teams aren’t clear on priorities.

Read More »
Words bad and good on slips of paper

Good Decision Bad Outcome

Not separating luck from decision quality in assessing outcomes often leads to learning the wrong lessons, and abandoning decisions that will, over time, yield higher cumulative returns.

Read More »

No comment yet, add your voice below!


Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get The Latest Updates

Subscribe to Our Latest Articles by Email